O'Toole

O'Toole v. Law Offices of Castaneda CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 2014B246977MCalifornia1,767 words

Opinion

Opinion

Flier, J.

Filed 9/26/14 O’Toole v. Law Offices of Castaneda CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

MARTY O'TOOLE, B246977

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC407172) v.

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND

LAW OFFICES OF CARINA DENYING PETITION FOR

CASTANEDA AND CARINA REHEARING

CASTANEDA,

CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

Defendant and Respondent.

THE COURT:*

The opinion filed August 27, 2014 is modified in the following manner: (1) The last sentence of the opinion is deleted. That sentence provides: “Respondents are entitled to costs on appeal.” (2) The following sentence is inserted in its place: “The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.