People v. Tafoya CA4/1

BACKGROUND

In February and March 2011 Tafoya obtained the personal identifying information

of the victims and used their information to commit theft. In February, Tafoya entered a

store with the intent to commit a felony.

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and

proceedings below. Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks this court to

review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436

(Wende). Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders) counsel

mentions as possible, but not arguable issues (1) whether the court properly limited

presentence credits to fifty percent of time served and (2) whether the court erred by

finding Tafoya competent to stand trial.

We granted Tafoya permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not

responded. A review of the record pursuant to Wende and Anders, including the possible

issues listed pursuant to Anders, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issues.

Tafoya has been competently represented by counsel on this appeal.

2

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

MCINTYRE, J.

WE CONCUR:

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

O'ROURKE, J.

3