Lockyer

Lockyer v. County of Nevada CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 2014C075249California2,831 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/29/14 Lockyer v. County of Nevada CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Nevada) ----

PETER LOCKYER et al., C075249

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No.

CU12078231)

v.

COUNTY OF NEVADA,

Defendant and Respondent;

NEVADA IRRIGATION DISTRICT et al.,

Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

In this appeal from a judgment denying a petition for a writ of administrative mandamus, plaintiffs Peter Lockyer and Juliet Erickson (jointly Lockyer) contend defendant County of Nevada prejudicially abused its discretion in failing to apply a

1 provision of the Nevada County Zoning Ordinance governing visually important ridgelines to an application for a permit to build a cellular phone tower. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.