Seabloom

Seabloom v. Wendel CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 2014B248665California361 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/29/14 Seabloom v. Wendel CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

CYNTHIA SEABLOM, B248665

Cross-complainant and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. KC063482) v.

CHRISTINE WENDEL,

Cross-defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Dan Thomas Oki, Judge. Appeal dismissed. ______ Christine Wendel, in pro. per., for Cross-defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Cross-complainant and Respondent. ______ Christine Wendel appealed from the May 7, 2013 order appointing a receiver in a cross-action brought against her by Cynthia Seablom and an underlying action between CPS Signage & Marketing Corporation, a company affiliated with Wendel, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.