People v. Kowitz CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 2014A139875California4,429 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

Filed 9/30/14 P. v. Kowitz CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A139875

v. MICHAEL DAVID KOWITZ, (Marin County Super. Ct. No. CR-136557A) Defendant and Appellant.

On a prior appeal defendant Michael David Kowitz challenged several trial court orders, including an order of victim restitution to be paid to Susan Dean, and an order denying him a refund of fines paid based on excess time he served in presentence custody (hereafter “excess custody credit”). (People v. Kowitz (October 22, 2012, A132409) [nonpub. opn.] at pp. 4-5 (Kowitz I).) We found the victim restitution awarded to Susan Dean properly included $5,000 for legal expenses, and remanded to the trial court to determine the dollar…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.