Jack Goodman v. United States

Good Law
369 F.2d 166
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 29, 196620811_1California2,048 words

Opinion

Opinion

369 F.2d 166 Jack GOODMAN, Paramount Ice Cream Corp. and Frigid Process Co., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Manuel L. Real, United States Attorney, Robert H. Lund, Chief Intelligence Division, Internal Revenue Service, Frederick C. Nielsen, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service, David Stutz, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service, and Keith M. Loebig, Internal Revenue Agent, Internal Revenue Service, Appellees. No. 20811. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. November 18, 1966. Rehearing Denied December 29, 1966. Walter Weiss, of Goodson & Hannam, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants. Richard C. Pugh, Act. Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Meyer Rothwacks, John M. Brant, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Manuel L. Real, U. S. Atty., Dzintra I. Janavs, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees. Before CHAMBERS, BARNES and ELY, Circuit Judges. BARNES, Circuit Judge. 1 This is an appeal in a civil action by which appellants sought the return of certain documents, and to suppress evidence. The United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division, accepted jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a), but dismissed the complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.