United States v. James Davis

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 30, 201413-50315California235 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 30 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 13-50315 13-50316 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:04-cr-00770-RGK v. 2:04-cr-00771-RGK

JAMES S. DAVIS, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 23, 2014**

Before: W. FLETCHER, RAWLINSON, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, James S. Davis appeals from the district

court’s judgments revoking supervised release and the three-month, concurrent

custodial sentences imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Davis’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.