People v. Espinoza CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 1, 2014B249246California1,086 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/1/14 P. v. Espinoza CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE, B249246

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. Nos. KA100239 & v. KA100537)

OSCAR BRIAN ESPINOZA,

Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT:*

Defendant and appellant Oscar Brian Espinoza (defendant) appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in consolidated cases. His appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende), raising no issues. After defendant was notified of his counsel’s brief he filed his own supplemental brief, contending that the trial court abused its discretion in consolidating the two…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.