Baker & Taylor Drilling Co. v. R. W. Stafford, Trustee

Good Law
369 F.2d 551
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 196720071California2,435 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tavares, J.

Appellee Stafford is the Trustee in reorganization of Tri-State Petroleum, Inc.; Appellant Baker and Taylor Drilling Company has filed a mechanics lien against a Texas gas well in which appel-lee claims an undivided interest on behalf of Tri-State. J. D. Amend also owns an undivided interest in the gas well in question, which is referred to as the Wilbanks Well, or the Section 2 well.

Baker & Taylor Drilling Company drilled the Wilbanks well and its lien is for approximately $27,000.00 which it claims is due for part of the drilling costs. While the Wilbanks well was being drilled, Baker & Taylor received three $20,000.00 checks from Tri-State, but it applied about $30,000.00 of that $60,000.00 to a pre-existing debt that Tri-State owed Baker & Taylor, as the balance due for drilling costs of a “dry hole” (referred to as the Nusbaum well or Section 54 well). The trustee claims that Baker & Taylor should have applied the full $60,000.00 to the cost of drilling the Wilbanks well.

Baker & Taylor has preserved its objection to the jurisdiction of the Court over the subject matter of the dispute and over Baker & Taylor as a party.

During 1962 Tri-State entered into a series of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.