People v. Hollis CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 2, 2014B255571California530 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/2/14 P. v. Hollis CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE, B255571

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. TA072499) v.

JAMAL HOLLIS,

Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT:*

Jamal Hollis (appellant) appeals from the judgment entered after the trial court denied his motion to modify his sentence. We appointed counsel to represent appellant on appeal. After examination of the record, counsel filed an “Opening Brief” in which no issues were raised. On August 5, 2014, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues which he wished us to consider. No response has been received to date.

*

BOREN, P. J.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.