Whitehead

Whitehead v. Young CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 2, 2014B251147California1,924 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/2/14 Whitehead v. Young CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

WILLIAM WHITEHEAD, 2d Civil No. B251147 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2013- Plaintiff and Respondent, 00434703-CU-PO-VTA) (Ventura County) v.

MARK YOUNG et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

Mark Young and Donahoe & Young, LLP appeal an order denying their special motion to strike a malicious prosecution action filed against them by William Whitehead. (Code Civ. Proc. § 425.16.)1 Whitehead sued Young and his law firm for initiating and maintaining two lawsuits against him on behalf of their clients Paul and Debbie Winchester for damage to their real property. Whitehead asserts the Winchesters' claims were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.