People v. Rose CA6

Filed 10/2/14 P. v. Rose CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, H038704

(Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 195814)

v.

MARC BERNARD ROSE,

Defendant and Appellant.

Marc Bernard Rose appeals from the August 17, 2012 order for commitment as a sexually violent predator (SVP) under the Sexually Violent Predator Act (SVPA) (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.).1 Rose raises multiple claims but we find no prejudicial errors. Accordingly, we will affirm the judgment. I Trial At trial in 2012, two psychologists testifying on behalf of the People, Drs. Harry Goldberg and Jack Vognsen, reported that they diagnosed Rose with a current mental disorder of pedophilia with an attraction to…