Hongqing Li v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
586 F. App'x 696
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 3, 201411-73320California288 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Hongqing Li, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals ( BIA ) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“U”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir.2010). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of Li’s asylum claim based on the vague and equivocal testimony the agency noted, and based on Li’s failure to corroborate his address when given the opportunity. See id. at 1048 (adverse credibility determination was reasonable under the “totality of circumstances”); see also Ren v. Holder, 648 F.3d 1079, 1094 (9th Cir.2011) (petitioner’s corroborating evidence did not compel the finding that he met his burden of proof). We lack jurisdiction to consider Li’s contention regarding his attorney’s efforts to obtain corroborating evidence in proceedings before the IJ because Li failed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.