In re Ricardo P. CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 6, 2014B252205California168 words

Opinion

Woods, J.

DISCUSSION

Ricardo contends, and the People acknowledge, that contrary to the reporter’s transcript, the preprinted minute order entered after the August 28, 2013 jurisdiction and disposition hearings incorrectly reflects the juvenile court declared the offenses alleged in “counts 1, 2 and 3” to be “misdemeanor[s].” Additionally, the boxes reading, “Minor is declared a ward of the Court pursuant to Section 602 WIC,” “Custody of minor is taken from the parents or guardians,” and “Minor is placed in the care, custody and control of the Probation Officer” were erroneously checked. We order the juvenile court to correct

2 these clerical errors on remand. (See People v. Farell (2002) 28 Cal.4th 381, 384, fn. 2 [record of court’s oral pronouncement controls over clerk’s minute order]; People v. Mitchell (2001) 26 Cal.4th 181, 185.)

DISPOSITION

We affirm the disposition as orally pronounced at the hearing, vacate the inconsistent order of August 28, 2013 and remand the matter for the juvenile court to conform the order to the juvenile court’s oral pronouncement.

WOODS, J.

We concur:

PERLUSS, P. J.

ZELON, J.

3