United States v. Dagoberto Cervantes-Portillo

MEMORANDUM

Dagoberto Cervantes-Portillo appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Cervantes-Portillo’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Cervantes-Portillo the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

-phis disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.