People v. Jones CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 7, 2014C066331California2,788 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/7/14 P. v. Jones CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C066331

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 08F06062)

v.

ADAM CHRISTOPHER JONES,

Defendant and Appellant.

A jury convicted defendant Adam Christopher Jones of stalking his work supervisor in violation of a temporary restraining order (Pen. Code, § 646.9, subd. (b)),1 and he was placed on probation. Defendant contends the trial court committed reversible error by (1) omitting a phrase from its oral reading of the instruction pertaining to the charge of stalking in violation of a temporary restraining order, even though the jury received the full text of

Undesignated statutory references are to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.