Smith v. Karabinus CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 9, 2014F068796California9,015 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kane, J.

Filed 10/9/14 Smith v. Karabinus CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

MATTHEW J. SMITH et al.,

F068796

Interveners and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 01FL00615) v.

DAVID KARABINUS, OPINION Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. Matthew J. Gary, Judge. Matthew J. Smith, in pro. per. for Interveners and Appellants. Barth Daly, Thomas W. Barth and Angie H. Palmerin for Respondent. -ooOoo- In the family law proceedings below, the trial court appointed attorney David Karabinus (respondent) in 2007 to represent the parents’ minor child therein.1 The same order that appointed respondent specified that his fees were to be paid by the mother. Nevertheless, from August 2007 through late 2010,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.