City of Palm Springs v. Original Grass Hopper CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 10, 2014E058243California2,344 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/10/14 City of Palm Springs v. Original Grass Hopper CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

CITY OF PALM SPRINGS,

Cross-complainant and Respondent, E058243

v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC1209192)

ORIGINAL GRASS HOPPER, INC., OPINION

Cross-defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. John W. Vineyard,

Judge. Affirmed.

Law Offices of James DeAguilera and James DeAguilera for Cross-defendant

and Appellant.

Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart, Jason M. McEwen and Jennifer L. Radaich for

Cross-complainant and Respondent.

The trial court granted cross-complainant and respondent City of Palm Springs

(City) a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.