City of Palm Springs v. Original Grass Hopper CA4/2
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 10, 2014E058243California2,344 words
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 10/10/14 City of Palm Springs v. Original Grass Hopper CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS,
Cross-complainant and Respondent, E058243
v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC1209192)
ORIGINAL GRASS HOPPER, INC., OPINION
Cross-defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. John W. Vineyard,
Judge. Affirmed.
Law Offices of James DeAguilera and James DeAguilera for Cross-defendant
and Appellant.
Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart, Jason M. McEwen and Jennifer L. Radaich for
Cross-complainant and Respondent.
The trial court granted cross-complainant and respondent City of Palm Springs
(City) a…