Whitcomb
Whitcomb v. Bonnheim CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Because the appeal arises on demurrer, we take the facts as pleaded in the first
amended complaint, the operative pleading. (Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist. (1992)
Cal.4th 962, 966-967.)
In October 2009, plaintiff consulted with attorney Bonnheim for legal help
regarding her financial affairs. She sought assistance with a loan modification of her
home mortgage, and possibly bankruptcy protection. Plaintiff had received a
determination of disability, but the disability had affected plaintiff’s earning capacity, and
she was having trouble making the payments on her home. Attorney Bonnheim told
plaintiff that he would apply for a modification of her home loan to reduce the monthly
payments, and he would file a lawsuit against appropriate parties for causes of action
related to the loan. Attorney Bonnheim also told plaintiff that, if necessary, he would
seek bankruptcy protection for her, to prevent the loss of her home to foreclosure and a
trustee’s sale.
Plaintiff paid attorney Bonnheim a retainer of $4,400 for this work. Attorney
Bonnheim did not provide a written legal services contract to plaintiff.
2 According to plaintiff’s…