People v. Varela CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
INTRODUCTION
Defendant Nicholas Varela, Jr., appeals from a sentence imposed after a probation
revocation. Defendant contends the trial court lost jurisdiction because it failed to
sentence him within the statutory 30-day limit under Penal Code section 1203.2a1 and
that his sentence should be vacated and his probation terminated. The People respond
that section 1203.2a only applies to a probationer who is committed to a state prison and
does not apply to a probationer sentenced to county jail under the Criminal Justice
Realignment Act of 2011. (§ 1170, subd. (h).) Therefore, the case should be remanded
for resentencing because the trial court was not authorized to sentence defendant in
absentia under section 1203.2a. The parties also disagree about whether section 1203.2a
violates equal protection.
We hold that section 1203.2a did not apply to defendant and does not violate equal
protection. We vacate the two-year concurrent sentence imposed under section 1203.2a
and remand for further sentencing.
II
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On April 6, 2012, defendant pleaded guilty in Riverside County to a burglary
committed in violation of section 459. The trial court…