Miner

Huntington Continental Townhouse Ass'n v. Miner

Good Law
179 Cal. Rptr. 3d 47·2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 914·230 Cal. App. 4th 590
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 14, 2014G049624California5,277 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fybel, J.

Introduction

The Orange County Superior Court, after a decision by the appellate division (Huntington Continental Town House Assn., Inc. v. Miner (2014) 222 Cal.App.4th Supp. 13 [ 167 Cal.Rptr.3d 609 ] (Huntington Continental)), certified this case for transfer to this court pursuant to rule 8.1005(a)(1) of the California Rules of Court to address a single question. The question is whether a homeowners association is required by the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act (Civ. Code, § 4000 et seq.) (the Davis-Stirling Act) to accept partial payments from an owner of a separate interest, who is delinquent in paying his or her assessments, after a lien has been recorded against the owner’s separate interest to secure payment of delinquent assessments and other charges. We ordered the case transferred to this court for hearing and decision.

We agree with the decision of the appellate division of the superior court in Huntington Continental, and hold that under Civil Code section 5655, subdivision (a) (section 5655(a)), a homeowners association (an association) must accept a partial payment made by an owner of a separate interest in a common interest development and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.