Tolmasoff

Tolmasoff v. Van Vorce CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 14, 2014B253836California2,215 words

Opinion

Opinion

Manella, J.

Filed 10/14/14 Tolmasoff v. Van Vorce CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

MORRIS GEORGE TOLMASOFF, B253836

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC491350) v.

MARY VAN VORCE,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Mel Red Recana, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of Jane Cervantes and Jane Cervantes for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

__________________________________ This case involves a dispute over a home located on North Rowan Avenue in Los Angeles. Respondent Morris George Tolmasoff, Jr., who had lived there for over two decades, secured a judgment for adverse possession in a suit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.