Juan Garcia-Herrera v. Nathalie Asher

Good Law
585 F. App'x 439
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 15, 201413-35435California357 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Juan Dedios Garda-Herrera appeals the district court’s denial of his habeas petition for lack of jurisdiction. We note that on September 26, 2014, we ordered Garda-Herrera to file a status report, informing the court of whether he remained in the United States and of the status of his application for relief under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (“DACA”) program. Garda-Herrera responded on October 6, informing the court that he was still present in the United States and that his DACA application had been denied. Because Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (“ICE”) refusal to delay his removal pending the adjudication of his DACA application formed the basis of Garcia-Herrera’s habeas petition, it appears that this case may be moot. However, we dismiss on the alternate ground of lack of jurisdiction.

The district court held that two statutory provisions, 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b)(9) and 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (g), deprived it of jurisdiction over Gareia-Herrera’s habeas petition. The former requires that claimants seek “review of all questions of law and fact ... arising from any action taken or proceeding brought to remove an alien from the United States” through a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.