Bahram Shaffaf v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
585 F. App'x 433
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 15, 201411-70496California346 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Petitioner Bahram Shaffaf petitions for review of a final order of removal issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 , and we deny the petition.

Shaffaf, an Iranian citizen, admits that he entered the United States illegally but argues that the BIA erred in denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).

‘We review the BIA’s denials of asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT relief for substantial evidence and will uphold a denial supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.” Garcia-Milian v. Holder, 755 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th Cir.2014) (internal quotation marks omitted). The substantial evidence standard is “extremely deferential: administrative findings of fact are conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” Lianhua Jiang v. Holder, 754 F.3d 733, 738 (9th Cir.2014) (internal quotation marks omitted).

The BIA and the immigration judge found that Shaffafs testimony and evidence were plagued by multiple inconsistencies, implausible claims, material…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.