Gjersvold

People v. Gjersvold

Good Law
178 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827·2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 923·230 Cal. App. 4th 746
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 15, 2014E059392California1,690 words

Opinion

Opinion

Richli, J.

I

INTRODUCTION

On February 2, 2013, a first amended information charged defendant and appellant Matthew John Gjersvold with unauthorized entry onto prison grounds by an ex-convict under Penal Code section 4571. The information also alleged that defendant had served a prior prison term under section 667.5, subdivision (b).

On May 23, 2013, the jury found defendant guilty as charged. Thereafter, defendant admitted the truth of the prior prison term allegation.

On June 21, 2013, the trial court granted defendant five years’ probation on the condition that he serve 365 days in custody.

On August 12, 2013, defendant filed his notice of appeal. Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that the trial court improperly instructed the jury that a jail officer must give informed consent for an ex-convict’s entry upon jail grounds to be authorized. For the reasons set forth below, we shall affirm the conviction.

II

STATEMENT OF FACTS

On January 25, 2013, the Department of Consumer Affairs revoked defendant’s private investigator license.

On February 2, 2013, defendant presented his revoked private investigator’s license and his driver’s license to Riverside County Sheriff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.