People v. Curtis CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 16, 2014C071952California5,726 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/16/14 P. v. Curtis CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Siskiyou)

THE PEOPLE, C071952

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. MC YK CR

BF 08-0001109-002.)

v.

DALE ALAN CURTIS,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Dale Alan Curtis was convicted of manufacturing concentrated cannabis. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379.6, subd. (a))1 and cultivating marijuana

1 Further undesignated statutory references are to the Health and Safety Code unless otherwise apparent from the context.

1 (§ 11358).2 Concentrated cannabis is the “separated resin, whether crude or purified, obtained from marijuana.” (§ 11006.5.) The sole issue tendered on appeal regarding the manufacturing conviction is whether a solution…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.