Marriage of Hogan CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 16, 2014B248740California3,403 words

Opinion

Opinion

Johnson, J.

Filed 10/16/14 Marriage of Hogan CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

In re the Marriage of ARACELI G. and B248740

BRENT M. HOGAN.

(Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BD423978)

PAUL LING et al.,

Appellants,

v.

DAVID J. PASTERNAK,

Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Thomas T. Lewis, Judge. Affirmed. Altshuler & Spiro and Bruce J. Altshuler for Appellants. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, Rex S. Heinke and Jessica M. Weisel for Respondent. —————————— Paul Ling and Edythe Ling (the Lings) appeal from the order awarding fees to receiver David J. Pasternak (Pasternak). The Lings co-owned three apartment buildings with Araceli and Brent Hogan (the Hogans), and during the Hogans’ acrimonious dissolution…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.