Bank of America v. Unit 73 Meadow Lane Partnership CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 16, 2014C072332California3,055 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/16/14 Bank of America v. Unit 73 Meadow Lane Partnership CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Mono) ----

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., C072332

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CV17200)

v.

UNIT 73 MEADOW LANE PARTNERSHIP et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

In this skirmish of competing real property liens, we shall affirm the trial court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings. Based on the plaintiff bank’s complaint and judicially noticeable facts, we conclude that a homeowners association (and, hence, its successor in interest, the defendants here), as a matter of law, had actual notice of circumstances sufficient to put a prudent person on an inquiry that would have disclosed that plaintiff bank had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.