Heredia

United States v. Heredia

Good Law
768 F.3d 1220·2014 WL 5018109·2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 19242
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 8, 201412-50331California7,589 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wardlaw, J.

Every day along the southwest border, previously deported aliens lacking entry documents are arrested, detained, and charged with illegal reentry. Once convicted, they serve a term of imprisonment, and then are again deported. The numbers are so great that federal prosecutors in these border states began to resort to an efficient means of securing a conviction: a “fast-track” plea agreement that binds the government and the defendant, but not the district judge.

The government secures the benefit of a streamlined process that minimizes the burden on its prosecutorial resources. It need not go before a grand jury to secure an indictment; battle motions, including collateral attacks on the underlying deportation; prosecute a jury trial; or oppose an appeal. The defendant, in turn, waives constitutional and other rights and agrees to a term of incarceration and, often, a term of supervised release ordinarily discouraged by the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. What is the incentive for the defendant to take this deal? The prosecutor binds his office to recommend a four-level downward departure in the offense level now advised by the Guidelines, and to present a “united front” in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.