In re Erik B. CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 20, 2014D064889California4,052 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/20/14 In re Erik B. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

In re ERIK B., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

D064889

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. JCM234188)

v.

ERIK B.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Polly H.

Shamoon, Judge. Affirmed with directions.

Andrea S. Bitar, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Appellant.

Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Julie L. Garland, Assistant Attorney General,

Peter Quon, Jr. and Parag Agrawal, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and

Respondent. At the age of 16, defendant and appellant Erik B. came to the attention of a police

officer when his mother informed the officer she was having a lot…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.