People v. Banks CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 20, 2014C075354California597 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/20/14 P. v. Banks CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C075354

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 12F06380)

v.

RICKEY ALLEN BANKS,

Defendant and Appellant.

This case comes to us pursuant to the provisions of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende), which requires us to review the entire record on appeal to determine whether there are any issues that arguably might benefit defendant Rickey Allen Banks.

We provide the following description of the facts and procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)

1 In 2012, the 14-year-old daughter of defendant’s live-in girlfriend reported that defendant repeatedly raped her,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.