United States v. Francisco Madril-Leyva

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 201413-10059California253 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 20 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-10059

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:12-cr-01684-RCC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

FRANCISCO JAVIER MADRIL-

LEYVA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Marvin E. Aspen, District Judge, Presiding**

Submitted October 14, 2014***

Before: LEAVY, GOULD, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Francisco Javier Madril-Leyva appeals from the district court’s judgment

and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 52-month sentence for reentry after

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Marvin E. Aspen, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation. *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.