Hui Chen v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
585 F. App'x 470
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 201409-71935California414 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Hui Xin Chen, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen. Bhasin v. Gonzales, 423 F.3d 977, 983 (9th Cir.2005). We grant the petition for review, and we remand.

In Chen’s original proceedings before the agency, Chen was a derivative on her husband’s asylum application, and the agency denied relief. After Chen and her husband filed a petition for review, her husband withdrew his application, and we dismissed the petition, noting the dismissal was without prejudice to Chen filing an application on her own behalf. Chen subsequently filed a motion to reopen, re questing reopening to file a new application in her own right, and also asserting changed country conditions. The BIA denied Chen’s motion as untimely, finding that she failed to show changed circumstances to qualify for the regulatory exception provided in 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(3)(ii).

The BIA abused its discretion by failing to consider Chen’s separate request for reopening to file a new asylum application…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.