State Compensation Fund v. Notis Enterprises CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 20, 2014B218667California6,813 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/20/14 State Compensation Fund v. Notis Enterprises CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE B218667

FUND,

(Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. BC365647)

v.

NOTIS ENTERPRISES, INC.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Mary Thornton House and Richard E. Rico, Judges. Affirmed. Lisitsa Law Corporation and Yevgeniya Lisitsa, Peter L. Weinberger & Associates and Peter L. Weinberger, for Defendant and Appellant. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, Fred R. Puglisi, James M. Burgess, and Dylan J. Price, for Plaintiff and Respondent. ______________________________ Notis Enterprises, Inc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.