Weakly-Holt

Weakly-Holt v. Foster

Good Law
179 Cal. Rptr. 3d 734·2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 945·230 Cal. App. 4th 928
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 21, 2014F067626California1,898 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hill, J.

Defendant appeals from a default judgment entered against him, contending his default was improperly entered because plaintiff failed to serve him with a statement of damages prior to entry of his default, which denied him his last opportunity to plead to the complaint and avoid a default. Because of the effect of the bankruptcy proceedings on the claims against defendant, we find no error in the trial court’s proceedings and affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff filed a medical malpractice complaint against defendant, a plastic surgeon. Defendant did not answer the complaint, but apparently notified plaintiff that he had filed a bankruptcy proceeding. On January 24, 2012, plaintiff obtained an order from the bankruptcy court granting her relief from the automatic stay of proceedings against the debtor. The order permitted her to proceed with her action, “so long as recovery against debtor is limited to available insurance proceeds.” On July 19, 2012, plaintiff requested, and the trial court entered, defendant’s default. On April 1, 2013, plaintiff served on defendant’s insurer, with a courtesy copy to defendant, a notice of default hearing,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.