Wofford

Wofford v. Superior Court

Good Law
179 Cal. Rptr. 3d 243·2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 953·230 Cal. App. 4th 1023
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 22, 2014D064633California5,407 words

Opinion

Opinion

Haller, J.

After being convicted of drug-related offenses, Lavina Carol Wofford was sentenced under the realignment act (Realignment Act) to serve a portion of her prison sentence released into the community under the mandatory supervision of the probation department. Among the many conditions of her mandatory supervision, Wofford is required to obtain the superior court’s consent before moving to another state. Apart from mandatory supervision requirements, a released offender who wants to transfer his or her supervision to another state must also obtain the approval of the California office that administers out-of-state transfer requests under the Interstate Compact for Adult Offender Supervision (the Compact or Interstate Compact).

After she was released in the community under mandatory supervision, Wofford filed a motion in superior court requesting that she be permitted to submit an application to California’s Interstate Compact office for a transfer of her supervision to another state. The court denied her request to apply to the Compact office, in part based on its conclusion that offenders serving mandatory supervision sentences are ineligible to apply for transfers under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.