Chow

Blueberry Properties, LLC v. Chow

Good Law
179 Cal. Rptr. 3d 145·2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 949·230 Cal. App. 4th 1017
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 22, 2014B254259California1,342 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kitching, J.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant Esther Khoe Chow appeals the trial court’s postjudgment order appointing the clerk of the court as an elisor to execute an escrow agreement on behalf of Chow. Chow had entered into a settlement agreement to sell her property to Plaintiff Blueberry Properties, LLC (Blueberry). When Chow refused to consummate the sale to Blueberry, the court entered judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6, ordering Chow to complete the sale. At Blueberry’s request, the court issued an order appointing an elisor to effect sale of the property. We affirm the trial court’s order because it was proper under section 128, subdivision (a)(4), which empowers the court to compel obedience to its judgments.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In June 2011, Chow entered into an agreement to sell her apartment complex located at 1242 Lilac Place, Los Angeles, California. However, Chow refused to complete the sale and returned the money Blueberry had placed in escrow for the property. Blueberry brought the present action for specific performance to enforce the purchase agreement. In July 2012, the parties entered into a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.