P.K.

P.K. v. H.M. CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 22, 2014G049542California10,581 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/22/14 P.K. v. H.M. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

P.K.,

G049542 (Cons. w/G049761) Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 13P001218)

H.M. et al.,

Defendants and Respondents. Adoption of N.K.

P.K.,

Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 13AD000217)

v. OPINION

H.M. et al.,

Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Ronald P. Kreber, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of Arthur J. LaCilento for Plaintiff and Appellant. Michelle L. Jarvis for Defendant and Respondent H.M. Ted R. Youmans and Leslie A. Barry for Defendants and Respondents Nicole and Grant K. * * * P.K.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.