In re Thomas A. CA2/7

DISCUSSION

We appointed counsel to represent Thomas on appeal. After examining the record, counsel filed an opening brief raising no issues. On June 10, 2014 we advised Thomas he had 30 days to personally submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. We have received no response. We have examined the record and are satisfied Thomas’s attorney on appeal has fully complied with the responsibilities of counsel and that there are no arguable issues. (See Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 277-284 [120 S.Ct. 746, 145 L.Ed.2d 756]; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 118-119; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)

2

DISPOSITION

The order is affirmed.

SEGAL. J.*

We concur:

PERLUSS, P. J.

ZELON, J.

* Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.

3