Rosemary Verdugo v. Target Corporation
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL VERDUGO, brother of No. 10-57008 Decedent; ROSEMARY VERDUGO, mother, successor and heir of Mary D.C. No. Ann Verdugo, Decedent, 2:10-cv-06930- Plaintiffs-Appellants, ODW-AJW
v.
OPINION
TARGET CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Otis D. Wright II, District Judge, Presiding
Argued May 7, 2012 Submitted October 28, 2014 Pasadena, California
Filed October 28, 2014
Before: Harry Pregerson, Susan P. Graber, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam Opinion; Separate Opinion by Judge Pregerson SUMMARY*
California Law
After the California Supreme Court answered a question that was certified by the panel, the panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal of a case, and held that Target Corporation, a commercial property owner, had no common law duty to provide an Automatic External Defibrillator in its stores for use in a medical emergency.