Reliance National Life Insurance Company v. Margaret Hackelman

Good Law
372 F.2d 133·1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7664
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 25, 196721139_1California41 words

Opinion

The plaintiff (appellee here) had no proof to spare, but we have concluded that there was an issue of fact which the district court could have decided either way. We affirm the judgment against the defendant (appellant) as not clearly erroneous.