Hamp

Hamp v. Harrison Patterson etc. CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 30, 2014D064453California9,228 words

Opinion

Opinion

Haller, J.

Filed 10/30/14 Hamp v. Harrison Patterson etc. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD HAMP, SR. D064453

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2011-00054272-

CU-PN-CTL)

HARRISON PATTERSON O'CONNOR & KINKEAD et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Timothy

Taylor, Judge. Affirmed.

Richard Hamp, Sr., in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Noon & Associates, Timothy S. Noon and Julianne Mizer, for Defendants and

Respondents.

Richard Hamp, Sr., sued his attorney, Harry Harrison, and Harrison's law firm

(collectively Harrison) for legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud on the

court.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.