Hamp
Hamp v. Harrison Patterson etc. CA4/1
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 30, 2014D064453California9,228 words
Opinion
Opinion
Haller, J.
Filed 10/30/14 Hamp v. Harrison Patterson etc. CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RICHARD HAMP, SR. D064453
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2011-00054272-
CU-PN-CTL)
HARRISON PATTERSON O'CONNOR & KINKEAD et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Timothy
Taylor, Judge. Affirmed.
Richard Hamp, Sr., in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Noon & Associates, Timothy S. Noon and Julianne Mizer, for Defendants and
Respondents.
Richard Hamp, Sr., sued his attorney, Harry Harrison, and Harrison's law firm
(collectively Harrison) for legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud on the
court.…