Rederi A/b Nordstjernan, Etc., AKA Johnson Line v. Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co.

Good Law
372 F.2d 674·1967 A.M.C. 1036·32 Cal. Comp. Cases 543·1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7445
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 196721161_1California1,830 words

Opinion

Opinion

Barnes, J.

Appellant was sued by one Bojorquez for injuries sustained aboard appellant’s vessel M/S ROSARIO. Appellant im- pleaded the appellee on third-party complaint. Trial to a jury was had, resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of Bojorquez against appellant, but denying appellant indemnification against ap-pellee. The trial court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 , and our jurisdiction rests on 28 U.S.C. § 1291 .

Appellant’s cargo vessel M/S ROSARIO arrived in Los Angeles in November of 1963 and was turned over to appellee, which is a stevedoring company, to discharge cargo to be landed in Los Angeles.

Of particular interest here is the discharging of cargo from the starboard lower hold #5. The construction of the starboard lower hold #5 is of prime importance. Basically it is a long rectangular area. Along the length of the port side of the hold, however, there is a housing (about 7 feet high and 6 feet wide) containing the vessel’s propeller shaft. There is a similar housing along the starboard side of the hold enclosing a fuel tank. The effect of these two housings is to create “shelves” along the length of the hold. The area between the shelves in the hold is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.