Ramos

Ramos v. Dillon CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 31, 2014D064589California4,222 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mcintyre, J.

Filed 10/31/14 Ramos v. Dillon CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

JASMINE RAMOS et al., D064589

Plaintiffs and Respondents,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2010-00087010-

CU-OR-CTL)

TERESA DILLON,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County,

Randa Trapp, Judge. Reversed and remanded.

Wicks Law, Coast Law Group and Rory R. Wicks for Defendant and Appellant.

Sharif Faust Lawyers and Matthew J. Faust for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Defendant Teresa Dillon appeals from a judgment in favor of Jasmine Ramos and

David Ramos (together the Ramoses) arising out of a partnership between the parties to

purchase and rehabilitate an apartment building.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.