NMS Properties v. Jones CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 4, 2014B246167California8,831 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/4/14 NMS Properties v. Jones CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

NMS PROPERTIES et al., B246167

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC432260) v.

CRAIG D. JONES et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment and order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles

County, Kevin C. Brazile, Judge. Judgment is affirmed; the post-judgment order

awarding attorney fees to R&D is reversed.

Manly, Stewart & Finaldi, Morgan A. Stewart and Timothy A. Burnett for

Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Callanan, Rogers & Dzida and Joseph S. Dzida for Defendants and Respondents.

_______________________________________ The City of Santa Monica (City) requires that,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.