People v. Valdivia CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 4, 2014E059857California364 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

Defendant committed a number of sex crimes against his 13-year-old neighbor

between January and September of 2011. On September 5, 2013, a jury convicted him of

four counts of committing a lewd act on a child under age 14 (Pen. Code, § 288, subd.

(a)),1 sexual penetration of a child under age 14 (§ 289, subd. (j)), three counts of

unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor under age 16 by a perpetrator older than

(§ 261.5, subd. (d)), oral copulation of a child under age 14 (§ 288a, subd. (c)(1)), and

sodomy of a child under age 14 (§ 286, subd. (c)(1)).

On October 18, 2013, the trial court sentenced defendant to 19 years in state

prison. The court began to impose a drug counseling requirement recommended in the

probation report pursuant to section 1203.096, but instead said “I’m striking that. It says

for substance abuse. [¶] I will order you to participate in all counseling or educational

programs having as a component programs related to the crimes for which you have been

convicted, which are for sex crimes.”

This appeal followed.

All section references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated.

DISCUSSION

Defendant argues the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.