Scott

Filed 11/5/14 Scott v. Promesa Behavioral Health CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

CRYSTAL SCOTT,

F067241

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 11CECG03193) v. PROMESA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, OPINION Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Mark W. Snauffer, Judge. Doyle & Schallert, David Douglas Doyle and Mark M. Schallert for Plaintiff and Appellant. Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, Jesse J. Maddox and Erik M. Cuadros for Defendant and Respondent. -ooOoo- Plaintiff sued her former employer alleging pregnancy discrimination based on defendant’s termination of her employment three weeks after she revealed her pregnancy. Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment, asserting it had legitimate,…