People v. Agers CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 5, 2014C075864California966 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/5/14 P. v. Agers CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Placer) ----

THE PEOPLE, C075864

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 62-118960)

v.

JASON MATTHEW AGERS,

Defendant and Appellant.

This case comes to us pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). Having reviewed the record as required by Wende, we shall affirm the judgment.

We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)

1 After his motion to suppress evidence was denied, defendant Jason Matthew Agers pleaded no contest to possession of MDMA1 for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378— count one) and possession of marijuana for sale…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.