Teal

Teal v. Superior Court

Good Law
179 Cal. Rptr. 3d 365·2014 Cal. LEXIS 10481·60 Cal. 4th 595·336 P.3d 686
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 6, 2014S211708California2,541 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chin, J.

On November 6, 2012, the California electorate approved Proposition 36, otherwise known as the Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012 (the Act), which became effective the next day. Before the Act’s passage, the “Three Strikes” law provided that a recidivist offender with two or more qualifying strikes was subject to an indeterminate life sentence if the offender was convicted for any new felony offense. (See People v. Yearwood (2013) 213 Cal.App.4th 161, 167-168 [ 151 Cal.Rptr.3d 901 ].) The Act amended the Three Strikes law so that an indeterminate life sentence may only be imposed where the offender’s third strike is a serious and/or violent felony or where the offender is not eligible for a determinate sentence based on other disqualifying factors. (Pen. Code, §§ 667, subd. (e)(2)(C), 1170.12, subd. (c)(2)(C).) The Act also enacted section 1170.126, establishing a procedure for an offender serving an indeterminate life sentence for a third strike conviction that is not defined as a serious and/or violent felony to file a petition for recall of sentence. (§ 1170.126, subd. (b).)

In this case, petitioner Bennie Jay Teal filed a petition for recall of his sentence. Finding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.