Hicks

People v. Hicks

Bad Law
179 Cal. Rptr. 3d 703·2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 1014·231 Cal. App. 4th 275·2014 WL 5771825
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 6, 2014C073357California3,038 words

Opinion

Opinion

Robie, J.

In 2008, a trial court sentenced defendant Tyrea Kinte Hicks to 25 years to life in prison under the three strikes law for being a felon in possession of a firearm and a concurrent sentence of 25 years to life (that was later stayed by this court) for being a felon in possession of ammunition, after a jury had found defendant guilty of those crimes.

In 2012, defendant filed a petition for resentencing under the Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012 (the Act). Under the Act, “prisoners currently serving sentences of 25 years to life for a third felony conviction which was not a serious or violent felony may seek court review of their indeterminate sentences and, under certain circumstances, obtain resentencing as if they had only one prior serious or violent felony conviction.” (People v. Superior Court (Kaulick) (2013) 215 Cal.App.4th 1279, 1286 [ 155 Cal.Rptr.3d 856 ].)

The Act makes “[a]n inmate . . . eligible for resentencing” if, among other things, “[t]he inmate’s current sentence was not imposed for any of the offenses appearing in clauses (i) to (iii), inclusive, of subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (e) of Section 667 or clauses (i) to (iii), inclusive,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.